I’m not going to go into the ‘science’ of homeopathy again, because I’ve done that before (seriously, if you don’t know what it is, follow that link back there). And besides, I’m starting to think the science angle is a bit (haha) pointless. Not because it’s wrong, but because it boils down to an un-winnable argument that goes something like this:
“Homeopathy can’t work because…. dilutions…. molecules… there’s nothing in it…. (etc)”
“AHHH but there are things science doesn’t understand… water memory… quantum (etc)”
“Ok, but many, many controlled trials have shown it doesn’t work.”
“Those trials are all carried out by the Big Pharma, I don’t trust them.”
“Well, actually, not all of them….”
“You can’t test homeopathy in the lab. It doesn’t work like that.”
“But it should, shouldn’t it? If it works? Legitimate pharmaceuticals have to pass those tests.”
“The tests are flawed.The whole peer-review system is corrupt.”
“Well, it may have a few problems, yes, but it’s the best thing we have right now.”
“Anyway, homeopathy cured by my brother’s milkman’s aunt’s dog’s arthritis.”
“Anecdotes really aren’t evidence.”
“Look, it doesn’t matter, I believe it works.”
And there we have it. You can’t get past that, at least, not with science. People that believe (and some of them are, worryingly, scientists and doctors) just believe. You can show them with evidence all day: they’ll tell you the science is wrong, or lacking in some way. Adding more science to that doesn’t help, it’s just – from the believer’s point of view – more science which is still wrong, or still lacking.
So recently I’ve taken another tack. I say, look for the money.In 1964 a stage magician and skeptic called James Randi issued a challenge, and it was this: anyone successfully demonstrating a supernatural or paranormal ability under agreed-upon scientific testing criteria would be paid a $1000 prize. Later it went up to $10,000, then $100,000 and eventually $1 million.
Since the challenge was first created by Randi over half a century ago, about a thousand people have applied, but no one has been successful. No one.
What does this have to do with homeopathy? Well, quite a lot. Because Randi has stated that homeopathy qualifies. In other words, anyone who can prove it works – under testing criteria agreed between the James Randi Educational Foundation (JREF) and the claimant – would win the $1 million. It doesn’t have to be some sort of ‘Big Pharma’ approved trial, it just has to be a trial that both JREF and the claimant agree, between them, is valid.
Big Homeopathy (well, they do it, why not us?) is unquestionably a million dollar business, perhaps the prize has never been claimed because ‘they’ don’t care about a piddly million dollars? But what about all the small-time homeopaths practising around the country? What about academics who continue to maintain that it works? Surely not all of these people are millionaires? $1 million has got to be worth having, hasn’t it?
I repeat. The prize never been claimed (despite at least one high-profile attempt).
James Randi, who is, at time of writing, 87 years old, has now retired. But fear not, JREF have said that they will continue the million dollar challenge “as a means for educating the public about paranormal claims”.
So this is what I say: if you believe homeopathy works, if you think you have convincing evidence that it works, go and claim the money. Then come back to me and we’ll talk. I promise to listen.
If you find yourself talking to proponent of homeopathy, suggest this to them, see what they say. One million dollars has got to be worth a bit of effort, surely?
Call me an old cynic, but I suspect at least some of these people know it doesn’t work, but selling pills that are made of nothing more than sugar, water and fancy packaging for over £5 a pop, or consultations at £30-£125 an hour, is making plenty of money anyway. Why mess with a good thing?
Forget belief, or even science. Look for the money.
Follow The Chronicle Flask on Facebook for regular updates.
Well put. Belief trumps all rational thought, even more so when the gullible can be fleeced at the same time. I think there are a couple of things, many who has been conned would rather convince themselves that they haven’t been taken for a fool and will therefore, accidentally as it were, support others equally taken in. I think that the ‘because something costs more, it MUST be worth more’ syndrome comes into play too. So the more you can get out of a group of people, the more you can get out of them, up to and including dying for the cause.
Look for the money…. Vatican anyone?
Well except for pharmaceuticals which have been tested and shown to work, after more than a decade’s R&D. When they’re expensive it’s all “Big Pharma!”
True, and proper testing costs a lot of time and money. Damned if I want to take anything that hasn’t been tested properly.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Half a decade is 5 years. Half a century is 50 years 🙂
Oops! Correcting now, thank you!